International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are the guidelines designed for all sorts of business affairs, so that company accounts are undersatndable and comparable across international boundaries. They are the consequence of growing international trade and are prominent for those companies which have dealings in several countries. It acts as a set of rules to be followed by accountants to maintain understandable, reliable and relevant as per the users internal or external.
Initially IFRS was an attemp to synchronize accounting arcoss the European Union but in no time IFRS concepts wre in demand all around the world.
Approximately 120 nations permit or require IFRS for
domestic listed companies, although approximately 90 countries have fully
conformed with IFRS as promulgated by the IASB and include a statement
acknowledging such conformity in audit reports. Other countries, including Canada
and Korea, are expected to transition to IFRS by 2011. Mexico will require IFRS
for all listed companies starting in 2012. Japan has introduced a roadmap for
adoption that it will decide on in 2012 (with a proposed adoption date of 2015
or 2016) and is permitting certain qualifying domestic companies to apply IFRS
from fiscal years ending on or after March 31, 2010. Still other countries have
plans to converge their national standards with IFRS.
And even in India IFRS has crawled its way. According to the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) IFRS will be mandatory in India for financial statements for the periods beginning on or after 1 April 2011. This will
be done by revising existing accounting standards to make them compatible with
IFRS. These accounting standards are known as Ind AS.
Before getting in to Ind AS let us try and understand
the pros and cons of convergence or adoption of IFRS.
Pros:
By adopting IFRS, a business can present its financial
statements on the same basis as its foreign competitors, making comparisons
easier. Furthermore, companies with subsidiaries in countries that require or
permit IFRS may be able to use one accounting language company-wide. Companies
also may need to convert to IFRS if they are a subsidiary of a foreign company that
must use IFRS, or if they have a foreign investor that must use IFRS. Companies
may also benefit by using IFRS if they wish to raise capital
abroad.
Cons:
Despite a belief by some of the inevitability of the
global acceptance of IFRS, others believe that Accounting Standards of India
(ASI) is the golden standard, and that a certain level of quality will be lost
with full acceptance of IFRS. Further, certain Indian issuers without
significant customers or operations outside the India may resist IFRS because
they may not have a market incentive to prepare IFRS financial statements. They
may believe that the significant costs associated with adopting IFRS outweigh
the benefits.
What is the difference between convergence and
adoption?
Adoption would mean that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sets a
specific timetable when publicly listed companies would be required to use IFRS
as issued by the IASB. Convergence means that the U.S. Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) and the IASB would continue working together to develop
high quality, compatible accounting standards over time. More convergence will
make adoption easier and less costly and may even make adoption of IFRS
unnecessary. Supporters of adoption, however, believe that convergence alone
will never eliminate all of the differences between the two sets of standards.
But India has made its peace to convergence to IFRS rather to adopt it.
In early 2010, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs
(MCA) issued various press releases on the IFRS roadmap and convergence plan
for India specifying the convergence date to be 1 April, 2011, through 2014 for
select Indian companies. Accordingly, ICAI has now come up with Ind AS.
Ind AS
Indian Accounting Standards ( Ind AS) are a set of accounting
standards notified by the Ministry
of Corporate Affairs which are converged with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).Now India will have two sets of accounting standards viz.
existing accounting standards under Companies (Accounting Standard) and IFRS converged Indian Accounting
Standards(Ind AS). The Ind AS are named and numbered in the same way as the
corresponding IFRS. As on date the Ministry
of Corporate Affairs notified 35 Indian
Accounting Standards (Ind AS). But it has not notified the date of
implementation of the same.
Ind
AS Ref
|
Ind
AS Name
|
Corresponding
IFRS
|
Existing
AS Ref
|
||
IAS/ IFRS
|
IFRIC
|
SIC
|
|||
IndAS
101
|
First-time Adoption of Indian
Accounting Standards
|
IFRS 1
|
|||
IndAS
102
|
Share based Payment
|
IFRS
2
|
|||
IndAS
103
|
Business Combinations
|
IFRS 3
|
AS 14
|
||
IndAS
104
|
Insurance Contracts
|
IFRS
4
|
|||
IndAS
105
|
Non-Current Assets Held for Sale
and Discontinued Operations
|
IFRS 5
|
AS 24
|
||
IndAS
106
|
Exploration for and Evaluation of
Mineral Resources
|
IFRS
6
|
|||
IndAS
107
|
Financial Instruments: Disclosures
|
IFRS 7
|
AS 32
|
||
IndAS
108
|
Operating Segments
|
IFRS
8
|
AS
17
|
||
IndAS
1
|
Presentation of Financial
Statements
|
lAS 1
|
AS 1
|
||
IndAS
2
|
Inventories
|
lAS
2
|
AS
2
|
||
IndAS
7
|
Statement of Cash Flows
|
lAS 7
|
AS 3
|
||
IndAS
8
|
Accounting Policies, Changes in
Accounting Estimates and Errors
|
lAS
8
|
AS
5
|
||
IndAS
10
|
Events after the Reporting Period
|
lAS 10
|
IFRIC 17
|
AS4
|
|
IndAS
11
|
Construction Contracts
|
lAS
11
|
IFRIC
12
|
SIC
29
|
AS
7
|
IndAS
12
|
Income Taxes
|
lAS 12
|
SIC
21,25
|
AS 22
|
|
IndAS
16
|
Property, Plant and Equipment
|
lAS
16
|
IFRIC
1
|
AS
6,10
|
|
IndAS
17
|
Leases
|
lAS 17
|
IFRIC 4
|
SIC 15,
27
|
AS 19
|
IndAS
18
|
Revenue
|
lAS
18
|
IFRIC
13,15,18
|
SIC
31
|
AS
9
|
IndAS
19
|
Employee Benefits
|
lAS 19
|
IFRIC 14
|
AS 15
|
|
IndAS
20
|
Accounting for Government Grants
and Disclosure of Government Assistance
|
lAS
20
|
SIC
10
|
AS
12
|
|
IndAS
21
|
The Effects of Changes in Foreign
Exchange Rates
|
lAS 21
|
AS11
|
||
IndAS
23
|
Borrowing Costs
|
lAS
23
|
AS
16
|
||
IndAS
24
|
Related Party Disclosures
|
lAS 24
|
AS 18
|
||
IndAS
27
|
Consolidated and Separate
Financial Statements
|
lAS
27
|
SIC
12
|
AS
21
|
|
IndAS
28
|
Investments in Associates
|
lAS 28
|
AS 23
|
||
IndAS
29
|
Financial Reporting in
Hyperinflationary Economies
|
lAS
29
|
IFRIC
7
|
||
IndAS
31
|
Interests in Joint Ventures
|
lAS 31
|
SIC 13
|
AS 27
|
|
IndAS
32
|
Financial Instruments:
Presentation
|
lAS
32
|
IFRIC
2
|
AS
31
|
|
IndAS
33
|
Earnings per Share
|
lAS 33
|
AS 20
|
||
IndAS
34
|
Interim Financial Reporting
|
lAS
34
|
IFRIC
10
|
AS
25
|
|
IndAS
36
|
Impairment of Assets
|
lAS 36
|
AS 28
|
||
IndAS
37
|
Provisions, Contingent Liabilities
and Contingent Assets
|
lAS
37
|
IFRIC
5,6
|
AS
29
|
|
IndAS
38
|
Intangible Assets
|
lAS 38
|
SIC 32
|
AS 26
|
|
IndAS
39
|
Financial Instruments: Recognition
and Measurement
|
lAS
39
|
IFRIC
9,16,19
|
AS
13,30
|
|
IndAS
40
|
Investment Property
|
lAS 40
|
Note:
The term 'International Financial Reporting Standards' ('IFRS') comprises of:
- International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)
- International Accounting Standards (lAS)
- Interpretations from the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC)
- Interpretations from Standing Interpretations Committee (SIC)
Conclusion:
Conversion is much more than a technical accounting issue. IFRS or Ind
AS may significantly affect any number of a company’s day-to-day operations and
may even impact the reported profitability of the business itself.
Conversion brings a one-time opportunity to comprehensively re-assess
financial reporting and take ‘a clean sheet of paper’ approach to financial
policies and processes.
Source-Internet